Executive Summary4–6 bullets · decisions, cost impact, schedule impact, top risks
1
1.1
1.2
No notes yet — type your own, or generate from the transcript.
1.3
1.4
1.4.1Carried from #55-1.4.1
Plan proposed to review comparable client deployments using anonymized examples referred to as Client A and Client B, based on Altera and JLL.
1.4.2Carried from #55-1.4.2
Question raised on who will be responsible for handling the resulting workload; no decision reached.
1.5
1.5.2Carried from #55-1.5.2
Question raised on meaning of 'projects transferred' metric and extent of migration; no decision reached.
1.5.3Carried from #55-1.5.3
Question raised on what level of detail the client expects regarding ERP-side project transfer information; no decision reached.
1.5.4Carried from #55-1.5.4
Request made for a team member to approve a pending invoice workflow item to demonstrate the process.
1.6
No notes yet — type your own, or generate from the transcript.
1.7
1.7.1Carried from #55-1.7.1
Question raised on whether to provide a specific number of ERP integrations or a general description of existing integrations.
1.7.2Carried from #55-1.7.2
No decision reached on how to quantify finance and procurement integrations for the client; carried forward.
1.8
No notes yet — type your own, or generate from the transcript.
1.9
No notes yet — type your own, or generate from the transcript.
1.10
No notes yet — type your own, or generate from the transcript.
1.11
1.11.1Carried from #55-1.11.1
Platform efficiency identified as the next agenda topic to be discussed.
1.11.2Carried from #55-1.11.2
Discussion of platform efficiency topics including updating project cost reports and forecasts, processing change orders through approval, and uploading/organizing project documents with desktop or folder sync, framed from a GC or consultant perspective.
2
2.1
2.1.1Carried from #55-2.1.1
Commercial confirmation identified as an agenda item, covering rationale for choosing the platform, next steps, licensing structure, and what is included in the subscription versus priced separately.
2.1.2Carried from #55-2.1.2
Pilot pricing referenced, with year two figure noted as 300; details to be finalized based on further input from Scott and Chris.
2.1.3Carried from #55-2.1.3
Question raised on whether tax functionality is demoed at any point; no decision reached.
2.1.4Carried from #55-2.1.4
Noted that Joel is prepared to present on tax functionality; placement within the agenda not yet determined.
Join this meeting
Everyone with this meeting open sees who is here and what they're editing, live. Your changes are recorded under this name.
Attendees